|

Home
JBM Research
JBM Health
economics
JBM Communications
How we work
About JBM
What's new?
JBM Publications

Email
enquiry
|
|
 |
Disparity in testing for renal
function in Primary Care in the UK
|
|
JBM
Research worked with the Department of Health Care Policy and
Management at the University of Surrey to investigate the type of
patients who undergo renal function tests in Primary Care. The
cross-sectional survey carried out in a London research network
revealed that 82% of patients with diabetes had their renal function
and protienuria tested, compared with only 0.5% of patients without
diabetes. Overall, older patients, those with diabetes and Black or
South Asian patients were most likely to undergo renal function
tests in Primary Care.
de Lusignan S, Nitsch D, Belsey J et al.
Disparities in testing for renal function in UK primary care:
cross-sectional study. Fam Pract 2011 Jun 30.
PubMed
abstract.
|
|
 |
JBM works
with the Clinical
Informatics Research Group to link data from patient databases and
aid international research
|
|
JBM
Research is working with the TRANSFoRm project (Translational
Research and Patient Safety in Europe) to develop a tool which will
enable researchers to assess the suitability of patient databases
(Primary Care databases, Biobanks and Disease Registries) to take
part in research. The TIRRE survey
(TRANSFoRm International Research Readiness Instrument) is an online
survey which explores the potential for data from Primary Care
databases, Biobanks and Disease Registries to be linked and used in
international research. We are working with Professor Simon de
Lusignan at the Clinical
Informatics Research Group at the University of Surrey and the
wider TIRRE team to analyse the data from the survey and refine the
questionnaire further.
For more information see
http://www.clininf.eu/jointirre/info.html
|
|
 |
JBM's work on classification of
diabetes in the news
|
|
JBM Research's recent
work with Professor Simon de Lusignan of St George's Medical School
was discussed in The Guardian. Jonathan worked with
Professor de Lusignan's team to assess the proportion of patients
with diabetes whose diabetes has been misdiagnosed or misclassified.
They found that 4% of the 2.4 million patients with a diagnosis of
diabetes in England either do not have diabetes (50,000 people) or
are classified as having type 1 diabetes when in fact they have type
2 diabetes, or vice versa (a further 50,000 people).
de
Lusignan S, Khunti K, Belsey J, et al. Organisation and delivery of
care: A method of identifying and correcting miscoding,
misclassification and misdiagnosis in diabetes: a pilot and
validation study of routinely collected data. Diab Med
2010; 27:203-209.
PubMed abstract.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/mar/01/nhs-pledges-to-improve-diabetes-diagnosis
|
|
 |
JBM's Dr Jonathan Belsey appears on Channel 4's
Grand Designs
|
Managing
Director of JBM, Dr Jonathan Belsey, has appeared on Channel 4's
Grand Designs programme (Wednesday 13th October) showcasing his
house build, completed in August 2009. The programme followed him
through the process of his bid to construct a functional family
home, designed to run with as low carbon footprint as possible,
including solar hot water panels and an experimental wind turbine.
Dr Jonathan Belsey on Grand Designs
|
 |
JBM Research's
latest publication reviews treatments for postmenopausal osteoporosis
and their impact on bone quality
|
JBM Research's recent
systematic review examines the influence of treatments for
postmenopausal osteoporosis (parathyroid hormone [PTH],
bisphosphonates, strontium ranelate and denosumab) on bone quality.
Bone mineral density (BMD) is the standard measure of bone strength,
however, measures of bone quality have the potential to explain, in
large part, the underlying impact of treatments for osteoporosis.
PTH has an anabolic mode of action,
directly increasing bone formation. Bisphosphonates and denosumab act by
reducing bone resorption to prevent the loss of bone. Strontium ranelate is
thought to have a mixed mode of action, increasing bone formation and decreasing
bone resorption.
PTH has been shown to increase bone
strength and BMD during treatment periods, and to reduce fracture risk. However,
effects appear to reverse once it is halted and a treatment strategy should
consider the appropriate medication post-PTH. Available evidence supports
sequential therapy with bisphosphonates (specifically alendronate) and by
treating with bisphosphonates after PTH, the benefit on BMD continues into later
years, maintaining improvements in bone quality and reducing the risk of
fracture.
Gallacher SJ, Dixon T. Impact of
treatments for postmenopausal osteoporosis (bisphosphonates, parathyroid
hormone, strontium ranelate and denosumab) on bone quality: a systematic review.
Calcif Tissue Int 2010 [Epub ahead of print].
PubMed PMID: 20872215
|
 |
JBM Health economics paper proposes solution to
health technology assessment
conflicts for biosimilars
|
The latest paper by
JBM Health economics explores the differences in the data
demanded by Health Technology Assessment (HTA) authorities and by
regulatory systems for biosimilars, and suggests that the
differences potentially deprive cancer patients of reasonably
priced, effective treatments and hinder best allocation of
resources. The paper argues that regulatory and HTA authorities need
to work together to encourage the widespread use of biosimilars
which may lead to the release of considerable resources.
The authors believe that HTA demands
for comparative efficacy trials data and cost-utility analysis for biosimilars
are inappropriate. Such conflicts between licensing and HTA authorities increase
the chance of rejection of some biosimilars by HTA authorities, thus leaving
only the higher cost patented products available. Ultimately, this could mean a
lack of competition for patented drugs from biosimilars which will keep prices
high and extend patent protection
The authors go on to propose that HTA
authorities should follow the lead of the EMA and accept pharmacokinetic and
pharmacodynamic equivalence between the branded drug and the biosimilar, and
cost-minimisation analysis as a basis for cost-effectiveness debates. It is also
recommended that strict pharmacovigilence protocols should be put in place to
exclude rare reactions and that cancer centres and trusts should also regularly
audit and publish the impact of biosimilars on clinical outcomes and resource
use. Eventually HTA authorities should look to manufacturers of biosimilars for
cost-analyses.
These steps would protect patients
and provide clinicians with rapid access to low-cost treatments.
Stewart A, Aubrey P, Belsey J.
Addressing the health technology assessment of biosimilar pharmaceuticals. Curr Med Res Opin 2010:26;2119-2126.
PubMed PMID: 20649394
|
 |
Latest meta
analysis from JBM Research demonstrates that PEG is significantly more
efficacious
than lactulose in adult constipation
|
JBM Research
conducted a systematic review and meta analysis to assess efficacy
of PEG versus placebo and active comparators in adults with
non-organic constipation. The paper is the only quantitative
statistical analysis to have been published in the field.
Twenty published randomised
controlled trials, with a parallel-group or cross-over design, comparing oral
PEG with placebo or a comparator laxative in adults with a history of
non-organic constipation were included in the statistical analysis. Ten of the
studies were PEG versus placebo (seven of which were high-quality), seven were
PEG versus lactulose (four of which were high-quality) and four were versus
other agents. A total of 2,240 patients from the US, UK, Spain, France, Italy,
Germany, Finland and China were included.
The analysis found that PEG treatment
resulted in a highly significant increase in defaecations/week over placebo, and
have clearly shown PEG to be more effective than lactulose. For PEG versus
placebo, the random effects pooled estimate of weighted mean difference was 1.98
stools/week when all studies were analysed. Using only the seven high-quality
studies saw the result increase to 2.34 stools/week. For PEG versus lactulose,
the difference was 1.01 stools/week, increasing to 1.65 stools/week in the four
high-quality studies.
JBM Research's analysis
provides an important insight into the comparative efficacy of PEG.
Belsey JD, Geraint M, Dixon TA.
Systematic review and meta-analysis: polyethylene glycol in adults with
non-organic constipation. Int J Clin Pract 2010:64;944-955.
PubMed PMID:
20584228
|
 |
JBM
Research's paper on hypoglycaemia is most widely cited paper in Diabetic
Medicine for 2008
|
JBM Research's paper on hypoglycaemia, published in
Diabetic Medicine in
2008, became the journal's most widely cited paper of that year. In
total, the journal published 294 papers in 2008 with a mean citation
rate of 3.93 citations/paper, but JBM Research's paper was the most
widely cited with 41 citations. Find out more about our original
research at JBM
Research.
Amiel SA, Dixon T, Mann R et al.
Hypoglycaemia in type 2 diabetes. Diab Med 2008;25(3):245-254.
PubMed PMID:
18215172
|